Relational Aesthetics
Nicolas Bourriaud
It’s a prologue, in a way. Ten years ago, it would have been completely
impossible to consider a DJ as an artist for example. Now, it’s normal. Nobody
would even think of saying "you’re already playing pre-existing records, so
you’re not an artist." That’s vanished. The idea of the artist as a kind of
demi-god creating the world from a blank sheet of paper is something that has
just vanished from our every day culture. The fact that the DJ or programmer or
artist uses already existing forms in order to say what they want to say is
something that is certainly the most important thing at the moment because it
totally goes beyond the art world.
I think the most important thing is you don’t have to be intimidated by
knowledge and by history. Most people’s relation to history can be summed up by
this image of somebody trying to walk into a room with a lot of porcelain and
fragile things and not wanting to break any of them. It’s super-precious and it
has to be kept exactly like it is. I think all these artists do exactly the
opposite. Which is they don’t care about any historical object, they just use it
and try to understand what’s in it. And these are two different ways of seeing
history — first as a commodified history, doing nothing to change it - or
revisiting it all the time and feeling totally free.
For Bourriaud, 1990s art is:
. relational art, whereby
. ‘meaning’ is interpreted collectively, socially, rather than intimately or individually…
. entirely beholden to environment and audience…
. the viewer not simply addressed, but allowed/encouraged to be or start a community or take an action…
. thus “relational aesthetics’…
. this relational art is a direct response to shift to service-based economy, virtual relationships and the web, and globalization …
. and ushers in a shift in attitude toward art for social change: “Instead of trying to change their environment, artists today are simply learning to inhabit the world in a better way.”
. such works insist upon use, as opposed to contemplation, in viewing art
. artist as DJ or programmer, rather than creator/initiator
. relational art is a direct outgrowth of installation art
http://eightysevenflorida.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/antagonism-and-relational-aesthetics-by-claire-bishop/
Nicolas Bourriaud
Excerpts from Relational Aesthetics, 1998
Their works bring into play modes of social exchange, interaction with the viewer
inside the aesthetic experience he or she is offered, and processes of communication in their
concrete dimensions as tools that can to be used to bring together individuals and human groups.
They therefore all work within what we might call the relational sphere, which is to today’s art
what mass production was to Pop and Minimalism.
In looking at relational art and the philosophy behind it, there is a lot i like about it. As a youth and family worker and outdoor educator i have always looked at creative ways to bring people together and share positive experiences. So discovering the comtempory art practice of Relational Asthetics that uses art to bring people together for a time is very exciting. The focus is about the the interrelationships that develop in the process, not on the final product.
For me this is exciting to consider as a practice together with land art, where the artwork is all about it's relationship with it's natural environment. Adding the relational dimension to landart is very exciting.
I want to incorporat this relational asthet practice into my land art project at lee point.